┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    CONTENT MODERATION ARCHITECTURE                          │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                             │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│  │ CONTENT INPUT                                                       │   │
│  │   User Content ───┬─── Reported Content ───┬─── Bulk Historical     │   │
│  └───────────────────┴────────────────────────┴────────────────────────┘   │
│                           │                                                 │
│                           ▼                                                 │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│  │ TIER 1: FAST CLASSIFICATION                                         │   │
│  │                                                                     │   │
│  │   ┌─────────────────┐      ┌─────────────────┐                     │   │
│  │   │Heuristic Matcher│──►   │ Toxicity Model  │                     │   │
│  │   │ (Blocklist/     │      │ (ML-based)      │                     │   │
│  │   │  Patterns)      │      └────────┬────────┘                     │   │
│  │   └────────┬────────┘               │                              │   │
│  │            │                        ▼                              │   │
│  │      [Block]                ┌─────────────────┐                    │   │
│  │            │                │ Spam Classifier │                    │   │
│  │            ▼                │ (Behavioral)    │                    │   │
│  │      Auto-Block             └────────┬────────┘                    │   │
│  │                                      │                             │   │
│  │                    ┌─────────────────┼─────────────────┐           │   │
│  │                    ▼                 ▼                 ▼           │   │
│  │              [Not Spam]        [Uncertain]         [Spam]          │   │
│  │                    │                 │                 │           │   │
│  │                    ▼                 │                 ▼           │   │
│  │              Auto-Approve            │           Auto-Block        │   │
│  └──────────────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────┘   │
│                                         │                                   │
│                                         ▼                                   │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│  │ TIER 2: LLM ANALYSIS                                                │   │
│  │   Context Analyzer ──► Policy Analyzer ──► Severity Scorer          │   │
│  │                                                │                    │   │
│  │                     ┌──────────────────────────┼──────────────┐     │   │
│  │                     ▼                          ▼              ▼     │   │
│  │                  [Safe]                  [Borderline]    [Violating]│   │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
│                     │                          │              │             │
│                     ▼                          ▼              ▼             │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│  │ ACTION LAYER                                                        │   │
│  │   ┌────────────┐  ┌────────────┐  ┌────────────┐  ┌────────────┐   │   │
│  │   │Auto-Approve│  │Human Review│  │ Auto-Block │  │  Appeal    │   │   │
│  │   │            │  │   Queue    │  │            │  │  Handler   │   │   │
│  │   └────────────┘  └──────┬─────┘  └──────┬─────┘  └──────┬─────┘   │   │
│  └──────────────────────────┴───────────────┴───────────────┴──────────┘   │
│                                         │                                   │
│                                         ▼                                   │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│  │ LEARNING LOOP                                                       │   │
│  │   Moderator Labels ──► Retrain Pipeline ──► Policy Updates          │   │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
│                                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

content_moderation/
├── app/
│   ├── __init__.py
│   ├── main.py                 # FastAPI application
│   ├── config.py               # Configuration
│   ├── models/
│   │   ├── __init__.py
│   │   ├── content.py          # Content models
│   │   └── decisions.py        # Moderation decisions
│   ├── classifiers/
│   │   ├── __init__.py
│   │   ├── heuristic.py        # Pattern matching
│   │   ├── toxicity.py         # Toxicity detection
│   │   ├── spam.py             # Spam classification
│   │   └── llm_analyzer.py     # LLM-based analysis
│   ├── services/
│   │   ├── __init__.py
│   │   ├── moderation.py       # Main orchestrator
│   │   ├── queue.py            # Review queue
│   │   └── appeals.py          # Appeal handling
│   ├── policies/
│   │   ├── __init__.py
│   │   └── community.py        # Policy definitions
│   └── api/
│       ├── __init__.py
│       └── routes.py           # API endpoints
├── workers/
│   └── moderation_worker.py    # Celery workers
├── tests/
└── docker-compose.yml

# app/models/content.py
from enum import Enum
from datetime import datetime
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
from typing import Optional


class ContentType(str, Enum):
    TEXT = "text"
    IMAGE = "image"
    VIDEO = "video"
    COMMENT = "comment"
    PROFILE = "profile"


class ModerationAction(str, Enum):
    APPROVE = "approve"
    BLOCK = "block"
    HUMAN_REVIEW = "human_review"
    SHADOW_BAN = "shadow_ban"
    WARNING = "warning"


class ViolationType(str, Enum):
    NONE = "none"
    HATE_SPEECH = "hate_speech"
    HARASSMENT = "harassment"
    VIOLENCE = "violence"
    SEXUAL = "sexual_content"
    SPAM = "spam"
    MISINFORMATION = "misinformation"
    SELF_HARM = "self_harm"
    ILLEGAL = "illegal_activity"
    PII = "personal_information"


class ContentItem(BaseModel):
    """Content submitted for moderation."""

    id: str
    user_id: str
    content_type: ContentType
    text: Optional[str] = None
    media_url: Optional[str] = None
    metadata: dict = Field(default_factory=dict)
    context: dict = Field(default_factory=dict)  # Thread context, reply-to, etc.
    submitted_at: datetime = Field(default_factory=datetime.utcnow)


class ClassificationResult(BaseModel):
    """Result from a single classifier."""

    classifier: str
    violation_type: ViolationType
    confidence: float
    details: dict = Field(default_factory=dict)
    processing_time_ms: float


class ModerationDecision(BaseModel):
    """Final moderation decision."""

    content_id: str
    action: ModerationAction
    violation_types: list[ViolationType]
    confidence: float
    reasoning: str
    classifications: list[ClassificationResult]
    requires_appeal: bool = False
    reviewed_by: Optional[str] = None  # "auto" or moderator_id
    decided_at: datetime = Field(default_factory=datetime.utcnow)

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ MODERATION DATA FLOW                                        │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                             │
│  ContentItem                                                │
│  (user post)                                                │
│       │                                                     │
│       ▼                                                     │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐    │
│  │ ClassificationResult[] (one per classifier)         │    │
│  │ • heuristic: SPAM, confidence=0.95                  │    │
│  │ • toxicity: NONE, confidence=0.12                   │    │
│  │ • spam: SPAM, confidence=0.87                       │    │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘    │
│       │                                                     │
│       ▼                                                     │
│  ModerationDecision                                         │
│  (final verdict)                                            │
│  • action: BLOCK                                            │
│  • violations: [SPAM]                                       │
│  • confidence: 0.95                                         │
│  • reviewed_by: "auto" or "moderator_123"                   │
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

# app/classifiers/heuristic.py
import re
from typing import Optional
from ..models.content import (
    ContentItem,
    ClassificationResult,
    ViolationType
)


class HeuristicClassifier:
    """
    Fast pattern-based classifier for obvious violations.
    Catches ~30% of violations with >99% precision.
    """

    def __init__(self):
        # Load from external config in production
        self._load_patterns()

    def _load_patterns(self):
        """Load blocklist patterns."""

        # Exact match blocklist (hashed in production)
        self.blocklist = set([
            # Known slurs and variations (simplified for example)
            # In production: load from encrypted database
        ])

        # Regex patterns for common violations
        self.patterns = {
            ViolationType.SPAM: [
                r"(?i)buy\s+now.*\d+%\s+off",
                r"(?i)click\s+here.*free",
                r"(?i)(telegram|whatsapp).*\+\d{10,}",
                r"(?i)earn\s+\$\d+.*per\s+(day|hour|week)",
            ],
            ViolationType.PII: [
                r"\b\d{3}-\d{2}-\d{4}\b",  # SSN
                r"\b\d{16}\b",  # Credit card
                r"\b[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z|a-z]{2,}\b",  # Email
            ],
            ViolationType.VIOLENCE: [
                r"(?i)(kill|murder|attack)\s+(all|every)\s+\w+",
                r"(?i)bomb\s+threat",
            ],
            ViolationType.SELF_HARM: [
                r"(?i)(suicide|kill myself).*method",
                r"(?i)how\s+to\s+(cut|harm)\s+myself",
            ],
        }

        # Compile patterns
        self.compiled_patterns = {
            vtype: [re.compile(p) for p in patterns]
            for vtype, patterns in self.patterns.items()
        }

    def classify(self, content: ContentItem) -> Optional[ClassificationResult]:
        """
        Fast heuristic classification.
        Returns result only if confident match found.
        """
        import time
        start = time.time()

        if not content.text:
            return None

        text = content.text.lower()

        # Check blocklist
        words = set(text.split())
        if words & self.blocklist:
            return ClassificationResult(
                classifier="heuristic",
                violation_type=ViolationType.HATE_SPEECH,
                confidence=0.99,
                details={"match_type": "blocklist"},
                processing_time_ms=(time.time() - start) * 1000
            )

        # Check patterns
        for vtype, patterns in self.compiled_patterns.items():
            for pattern in patterns:
                if pattern.search(content.text):
                    return ClassificationResult(
                        classifier="heuristic",
                        violation_type=vtype,
                        confidence=0.95,
                        details={
                            "match_type": "pattern",
                            "pattern": pattern.pattern
                        },
                        processing_time_ms=(time.time() - start) * 1000
                    )

        return None  # No confident match

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ HEURISTIC CLASSIFIER ROLE                                   │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                             │
│  Catches ~30% of violations with >99% precision             │
│                                                             │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐    │
│  │ BLOCKLIST (exact match)                             │    │
│  │ • Known slurs and variations                        │    │
│  │ • Processing: O(1) hash lookup                      │    │
│  │ • Confidence: 0.99 (near-certain)                   │    │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘    │
│       │ No match                                             │
│       ▼                                                      │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐    │
│  │ PATTERN MATCHING (regex)                            │    │
│  │ • SPAM: "buy now.*\d+% off"                         │    │
│  │ • PII: SSN, credit card, email patterns             │    │
│  │ • VIOLENCE: "bomb threat", "kill all"               │    │
│  │ • Processing: Compiled regex, ~1ms                  │    │
│  │ • Confidence: 0.95 (high certainty)                 │    │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘    │
│       │ No match                                            │
│       ▼                                                     │
│  Pass to ML classifiers (more expensive)                    │
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

# app/classifiers/toxicity.py
import time
from typing import Optional
import torch
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForSequenceClassification

from ..models.content import (
    ContentItem,
    ClassificationResult,
    ViolationType
)


class ToxicityClassifier:
    """
    ML-based toxicity detection using Detoxify/similar models.
    Handles nuanced toxicity that heuristics miss.
    """

    TOXICITY_THRESHOLD = 0.7
    SEVERE_THRESHOLD = 0.85

    # Map model labels to violation types
    LABEL_MAPPING = {
        "toxic": ViolationType.HARASSMENT,
        "severe_toxic": ViolationType.HARASSMENT,
        "obscene": ViolationType.SEXUAL,
        "threat": ViolationType.VIOLENCE,
        "insult": ViolationType.HARASSMENT,
        "identity_attack": ViolationType.HATE_SPEECH,
        "sexual_explicit": ViolationType.SEXUAL,
    }

    def __init__(self, model_name: str = "unitary/toxic-bert"):
        self.device = "cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu"
        self.tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
        self.model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained(
            model_name
        ).to(self.device)
        self.model.eval()

        # Get label names from model config
        self.labels = list(self.model.config.id2label.values())

    def classify(self, content: ContentItem) -> Optional[ClassificationResult]:
        """Classify content for toxicity."""
        start = time.time()

        if not content.text:
            return None

        # Tokenize
        inputs = self.tokenizer(
            content.text,
            return_tensors="pt",
            truncation=True,
            max_length=512
        ).to(self.device)

        # Predict
        with torch.no_grad():
            outputs = self.model(**inputs)
            probs = torch.sigmoid(outputs.logits)[0].cpu().numpy()

        # Map to label scores
        scores = {
            label: float(prob)
            for label, prob in zip(self.labels, probs)
        }

        # Find highest violation
        max_label = max(scores, key=scores.get)
        max_score = scores[max_label]

        processing_time = (time.time() - start) * 1000

        if max_score < self.TOXICITY_THRESHOLD:
            return ClassificationResult(
                classifier="toxicity",
                violation_type=ViolationType.NONE,
                confidence=1 - max_score,
                details={"scores": scores},
                processing_time_ms=processing_time
            )

        # Map to violation type
        violation_type = self.LABEL_MAPPING.get(
            max_label,
            ViolationType.HARASSMENT
        )

        return ClassificationResult(
            classifier="toxicity",
            violation_type=violation_type,
            confidence=max_score,
            details={
                "scores": scores,
                "primary_label": max_label,
                "is_severe": max_score >= self.SEVERE_THRESHOLD
            },
            processing_time_ms=processing_time
        )

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ TOXICITY DETECTION                                          │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                             │
│  "You're an absolute genius" ← sarcasm? sincere?            │
│  "This policy is killing our community" ← metaphor          │
│                                                             │
│  Heuristics can't handle nuance. ML models trained on       │
│  millions of labeled examples understand context better.    │
│                                                             │
│  Model: unitary/toxic-bert (or Detoxify)                    │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐    │
│  │ Multi-label classification                          │    │
│  │                                                     │    │
│  │ Input: "You're worthless and should quit"           │    │
│  │                                                     │    │
│  │ Output (sigmoid probabilities):                     │    │
│  │ • toxic: 0.89                                       │    │
│  │ • severe_toxic: 0.23                                │    │
│  │ • insult: 0.91 ← highest                           │    │
│  │ • threat: 0.02                                      │    │
│  │ • identity_attack: 0.05                             │    │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘    │
│                                                             │
│  Decision:                                                  │
│  • max_score = 0.91 (insult) → HARASSMENT                   │
│  • 0.91 > 0.85 SEVERE_THRESHOLD → is_severe = true         │
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

# app/classifiers/spam.py
import time
import hashlib
from collections import defaultdict
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
from typing import Optional
import redis

from ..models.content import (
    ContentItem,
    ClassificationResult,
    ViolationType
)


class SpamClassifier:
    """
    Spam detection using behavioral signals and content analysis.
    """

    DUPLICATE_THRESHOLD = 0.8
    RATE_LIMIT_WINDOW = 60  # seconds
    RATE_LIMIT_MAX = 10  # posts per window

    def __init__(self, redis_client: redis.Redis):
        self.redis = redis_client

        # Spam indicators
        self.spam_signals = {
            "excessive_caps": lambda t: sum(1 for c in t if c.isupper()) / max(len(t), 1) > 0.5,
            "excessive_emoji": lambda t: t.count("") > 10,  # placeholder
            "link_heavy": lambda t: t.count("http") > 3,
            "repetitive_chars": lambda t: any(c * 5 in t for c in set(t)),
        }

    def _content_hash(self, text: str) -> str:
        """Create hash for deduplication."""
        normalized = " ".join(text.lower().split())
        return hashlib.sha256(normalized.encode()).hexdigest()[:16]

    def _check_rate_limit(self, user_id: str) -> tuple[bool, int]:
        """Check if user is posting too frequently."""
        key = f"rate:{user_id}"

        pipe = self.redis.pipeline()
        now = datetime.utcnow().timestamp()
        window_start = now - self.RATE_LIMIT_WINDOW

        # Remove old entries and count
        pipe.zremrangebyscore(key, 0, window_start)
        pipe.zcard(key)
        pipe.zadd(key, {str(now): now})
        pipe.expire(key, self.RATE_LIMIT_WINDOW * 2)

        _, count, _, _ = pipe.execute()

        return count >= self.RATE_LIMIT_MAX, count

    def _check_duplicate(self, content: ContentItem) -> tuple[bool, int]:
        """Check for duplicate/near-duplicate content."""
        if not content.text:
            return False, 0

        content_hash = self._content_hash(content.text)
        key = f"content_hash:{content_hash}"

        # Increment and get count
        count = self.redis.incr(key)
        self.redis.expire(key, 3600)  # 1 hour window

        return count > 1, count

    def classify(self, content: ContentItem) -> Optional[ClassificationResult]:
        """Classify content for spam."""
        start = time.time()

        signals_detected = []
        spam_score = 0.0

        # Check rate limiting
        rate_limited, post_count = self._check_rate_limit(content.user_id)
        if rate_limited:
            signals_detected.append("rate_limit_exceeded")
            spam_score += 0.4

        # Check duplicates
        is_duplicate, dup_count = self._check_duplicate(content)
        if is_duplicate:
            signals_detected.append(f"duplicate_content_{dup_count}")
            spam_score += 0.3 * min(dup_count, 3)

        # Check content signals
        if content.text:
            for signal_name, check_fn in self.spam_signals.items():
                try:
                    if check_fn(content.text):
                        signals_detected.append(signal_name)
                        spam_score += 0.15
                except Exception:
                    pass

        processing_time = (time.time() - start) * 1000

        # Cap at 1.0
        spam_score = min(spam_score, 1.0)

        if spam_score < 0.3:
            return ClassificationResult(
                classifier="spam",
                violation_type=ViolationType.NONE,
                confidence=1 - spam_score,
                details={"signals": signals_detected},
                processing_time_ms=processing_time
            )

        return ClassificationResult(
            classifier="spam",
            violation_type=ViolationType.SPAM,
            confidence=spam_score,
            details={
                "signals": signals_detected,
                "post_count": post_count,
                "duplicate_count": dup_count
            },
            processing_time_ms=processing_time
        )

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ SPAM DETECTION SIGNALS                                      │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                             │
│  USER BEHAVIOR (Redis tracking)                             │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐    │
│  │ Rate Limiting                                       │    │
│  │ • Track posts per minute per user (sorted set)      │    │
│  │ • 10+ posts/minute → likely bot                     │    │
│  │ • Score: +0.4                                       │    │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘    │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐    │
│  │ Duplicate Detection                                 │    │
│  │ • Hash content, track occurrences                   │    │
│  │ • Same content posted 3x → spam                     │    │
│  │ • Score: +0.3 per duplicate                         │    │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘    │
│                                                              │
│  CONTENT SIGNALS                                             │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐    │
│  │ • excessive_caps: "BUY NOW!!!"                      │    │
│  │ • excessive_emoji: 10+ emojis                       │    │
│  │ • link_heavy: 3+ HTTP links                         │    │
│  │ • repetitive_chars: "helloooooo"                    │    │
│  │ • Score: +0.15 each                                 │    │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘    │
│                                                             │
│  Total Score (capped at 1.0):                               │
│  • Below 0.3 → NOT SPAM                                     │
│  • 0.3+ → SPAM (confidence = score)                         │
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

# app/classifiers/llm_analyzer.py
import time
from typing import Optional
from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI
from langchain_core.prompts import ChatPromptTemplate
from langchain_core.output_parsers import PydanticOutputParser
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field

from ..models.content import (
    ContentItem,
    ClassificationResult,
    ViolationType,
    ModerationAction
)
from ..policies.community import CommunityGuidelines


class LLMAnalysis(BaseModel):
    """Structured output from LLM analysis."""

    violates_policy: bool = Field(
        description="Whether content violates community guidelines"
    )
    violation_types: list[str] = Field(
        default_factory=list,
        description="List of violation categories"
    )
    severity: str = Field(
        description="Severity level: low, medium, high, critical"
    )
    confidence: float = Field(
        ge=0, le=1,
        description="Confidence in this assessment"
    )
    reasoning: str = Field(
        description="Detailed reasoning for the decision"
    )
    context_matters: bool = Field(
        description="Whether context significantly affects interpretation"
    )
    recommended_action: str = Field(
        description="Recommended action: approve, warn, remove, ban"
    )


class LLMPolicyAnalyzer:
    """
    LLM-based content analysis for nuanced policy violations.
    Used for borderline cases that fast classifiers can't handle.
    """

    SEVERITY_TO_ACTION = {
        "low": ModerationAction.WARNING,
        "medium": ModerationAction.HUMAN_REVIEW,
        "high": ModerationAction.BLOCK,
        "critical": ModerationAction.BLOCK,
    }

    def __init__(
        self,
        model: str = "gpt-4o",
        guidelines: Optional[CommunityGuidelines] = None
    ):
        self.llm = ChatOpenAI(model=model, temperature=0)
        self.guidelines = guidelines or CommunityGuidelines()
        self.parser = PydanticOutputParser(pydantic_object=LLMAnalysis)

        self.prompt = ChatPromptTemplate.from_messages([
            ("system", """You are a content moderation expert. Analyze user-generated
content against community guidelines and determine if it violates policies.

COMMUNITY GUIDELINES:
{guidelines}

IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS:
1. Context matters - consider replies, threads, cultural context
2. Distinguish between harmful content and legitimate discussion OF harmful topics
3. Consider intent - education, news, satire vs. genuine harm
4. Err on the side of caution for content targeting individuals
5. Consider the platform context (this is a {platform_type})

VIOLATION CATEGORIES:
- hate_speech: Attacks on protected groups
- harassment: Targeted attacks on individuals
- violence: Threats, glorification, or instructions for violence
- sexual_content: Explicit sexual content (context-dependent)
- spam: Commercial spam, scams, manipulation
- misinformation: Demonstrably false claims causing harm
- self_harm: Promotion or instructions for self-harm
- illegal_activity: Illegal products, services, or activities
- personal_information: Doxxing, sharing private info

{format_instructions}"""),
            ("human", """Analyze this content:

CONTENT TYPE: {content_type}
USER ID: {user_id}
CONTENT: {text}

CONTEXT (if available):
{context}

Previous classifications from automated systems:
{prior_classifications}

Provide your analysis.""")
        ])

    def analyze(
        self,
        content: ContentItem,
        prior_classifications: list[ClassificationResult],
        platform_type: str = "social media platform"
    ) -> ClassificationResult:
        """Perform deep LLM analysis on content."""
        start = time.time()

        # Format prior classifications
        prior_str = "\n".join([
            f"- {c.classifier}: {c.violation_type.value} (confidence: {c.confidence:.2f})"
            for c in prior_classifications
        ]) or "None"

        # Format context
        context_str = "\n".join([
            f"- {k}: {v}" for k, v in content.context.items()
        ]) or "No additional context"

        # Build prompt
        chain = self.prompt | self.llm | self.parser

        try:
            result: LLMAnalysis = chain.invoke({
                "guidelines": self.guidelines.to_text(),
                "platform_type": platform_type,
                "format_instructions": self.parser.get_format_instructions(),
                "content_type": content.content_type.value,
                "user_id": content.user_id,
                "text": content.text or "[No text - media only]",
                "context": context_str,
                "prior_classifications": prior_str,
            })

            # Map to violation type
            violation_type = ViolationType.NONE
            if result.violates_policy and result.violation_types:
                # Take the most severe violation
                for vt in result.violation_types:
                    try:
                        violation_type = ViolationType(vt)
                        break
                    except ValueError:
                        continue

            return ClassificationResult(
                classifier="llm_analyzer",
                violation_type=violation_type,
                confidence=result.confidence,
                details={
                    "severity": result.severity,
                    "reasoning": result.reasoning,
                    "context_matters": result.context_matters,
                    "recommended_action": result.recommended_action,
                    "all_violations": result.violation_types,
                },
                processing_time_ms=(time.time() - start) * 1000
            )

        except Exception as e:
            # Fallback for LLM errors
            return ClassificationResult(
                classifier="llm_analyzer",
                violation_type=ViolationType.NONE,
                confidence=0.0,
                details={"error": str(e)},
                processing_time_ms=(time.time() - start) * 1000
            )

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ LLM ANALYSIS - WHEN CONTEXT MATTERS                         │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                             │
│  Example: "I want to kill this game's final boss"           │
│                                                             │
│  Heuristic: ⚠️ "kill" detected → flags violence             │
│  ML Model: ⚠️ 0.65 confidence → borderline                  │
│  LLM: ✓ Gaming context → NOT a violation                    │
│                                                             │
│  LLM receives:                                              │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐    │
│  │ 1. Community Guidelines (full policy document)      │    │
│  │ 2. Platform type ("gaming forum")                   │    │
│  │ 3. Content + context (thread, replies, user type)   │    │
│  │ 4. Prior classifier results (for calibration)       │    │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘    │
│                                                             │
│  LLM outputs structured analysis:                           │
│  • violates_policy: false                                   │
│  • severity: "none"                                         │
│  • reasoning: "Gaming context, 'kill' refers to game..."    │
│  • context_matters: true                                    │
│  • recommended_action: "approve"                            │
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

# app/policies/community.py
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from typing import Optional


@dataclass
class PolicyRule:
    """A single policy rule."""

    id: str
    category: str
    description: str
    examples_violating: list[str] = field(default_factory=list)
    examples_allowed: list[str] = field(default_factory=list)
    severity: str = "medium"  # low, medium, high, critical
    requires_context: bool = False


class CommunityGuidelines:
    """
    Community guidelines definition.
    In production, load from database/CMS.
    """

    def __init__(self):
        self.rules = self._load_default_rules()

    def _load_default_rules(self) -> list[PolicyRule]:
        """Load default community guidelines."""
        return [
            PolicyRule(
                id="hate-1",
                category="hate_speech",
                description="Content that attacks or demeans groups based on protected characteristics (race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, disability, nationality)",
                examples_violating=[
                    "All [group] are criminals",
                    "Slurs targeting protected groups",
                    "Calls to exclude groups from society",
                ],
                examples_allowed=[
                    "Discussion of discrimination issues",
                    "News reporting on hate crimes",
                    "Academic analysis of prejudice",
                ],
                severity="high",
                requires_context=True
            ),
            PolicyRule(
                id="harass-1",
                category="harassment",
                description="Targeted attacks, bullying, or intimidation of specific individuals",
                examples_violating=[
                    "Repeated negative comments targeting a user",
                    "Sharing someone's private information",
                    "Coordinated attacks on individuals",
                ],
                examples_allowed=[
                    "Criticism of public figures' actions",
                    "Disagreement in debates",
                    "Negative reviews of businesses",
                ],
                severity="high",
                requires_context=True
            ),
            PolicyRule(
                id="violence-1",
                category="violence",
                description="Threats of violence, glorification of violence, or instructions for violent acts",
                examples_violating=[
                    "Specific threats against individuals or groups",
                    "Instructions for creating weapons",
                    "Celebrating violent attacks",
                ],
                examples_allowed=[
                    "News reporting on violence",
                    "Historical education",
                    "Fictional violence in clearly marked fiction",
                ],
                severity="critical",
                requires_context=True
            ),
            PolicyRule(
                id="spam-1",
                category="spam",
                description="Commercial spam, scams, or manipulation campaigns",
                examples_violating=[
                    "Unsolicited commercial promotion",
                    "Get-rich-quick schemes",
                    "Fake engagement requests",
                ],
                examples_allowed=[
                    "Genuine product recommendations",
                    "Business accounts promoting services",
                ],
                severity="medium",
                requires_context=False
            ),
            PolicyRule(
                id="misinfo-1",
                category="misinformation",
                description="Demonstrably false information that could cause real-world harm",
                examples_violating=[
                    "False medical advice (e.g., dangerous 'cures')",
                    "Election interference claims",
                    "Crisis event misinformation",
                ],
                examples_allowed=[
                    "Opinion and political commentary",
                    "Satire (when clearly marked)",
                    "Honest mistakes with corrections",
                ],
                severity="high",
                requires_context=True
            ),
        ]

    def to_text(self) -> str:
        """Convert guidelines to text for LLM."""
        sections = []

        for rule in self.rules:
            section = f"""
## {rule.category.upper()} ({rule.id})
{rule.description}

Severity: {rule.severity}
Requires Context: {'Yes' if rule.requires_context else 'No'}

Examples of VIOLATIONS:
{chr(10).join('- ' + ex for ex in rule.examples_violating)}

Examples of ALLOWED content:
{chr(10).join('- ' + ex for ex in rule.examples_allowed)}
"""
            sections.append(section)

        return "\n---\n".join(sections)

    def get_rule(self, rule_id: str) -> Optional[PolicyRule]:
        """Get a specific rule by ID."""
        for rule in self.rules:
            if rule.id == rule_id:
                return rule
        return None

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ POLICY RULE STRUCTURE                                       │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                             │
│  Each rule has:                                             │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐    │
│  │ id: "hate-1" (unique identifier for tracking)       │    │
│  │ category: "hate_speech" (maps to ViolationType)     │    │
│  │ description: "Attacks on protected groups..."       │    │
│  │                                                     │    │
│  │ examples_violating: ["All [group] are criminals"]   │    │
│  │ examples_allowed: ["Discussion of discrimination"]  │    │
│  │                                                     │    │
│  │ severity: "high" (drives action selection)          │    │
│  │ requires_context: true (needs LLM review)           │    │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘    │
│                                                             │
│  Why examples matter:                                       │
│  • LLM learns the BOUNDARY between allowed and forbidden    │
│  • "Discussion of hate crimes" vs "Committing hate speech"  │
│  • Reduces false positives on legitimate discourse          │
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

# app/services/moderation.py
import time
from typing import Optional
import redis
from dataclasses import dataclass

from ..models.content import (
    ContentItem,
    ClassificationResult,
    ModerationDecision,
    ModerationAction,
    ViolationType,
)
from ..classifiers.heuristic import HeuristicClassifier
from ..classifiers.toxicity import ToxicityClassifier
from ..classifiers.spam import SpamClassifier
from ..classifiers.llm_analyzer import LLMPolicyAnalyzer


@dataclass
class ModerationConfig:
    """Configuration for moderation thresholds."""

    # Confidence thresholds
    auto_block_threshold: float = 0.95
    auto_approve_threshold: float = 0.2
    llm_review_threshold: float = 0.6

    # Rate limits
    enable_rate_limiting: bool = True

    # LLM usage
    always_use_llm: bool = False
    llm_for_borderline: bool = True


class ModerationOrchestrator:
    """
    Orchestrates multi-tier content moderation.

    Flow:
    1. Heuristic check (fast blocklist/pattern matching)
    2. ML toxicity check (if passes heuristic)
    3. Spam detection (behavioral + content)
    4. LLM analysis (for borderline cases)
    5. Final decision
    """

    def __init__(
        self,
        redis_client: redis.Redis,
        config: Optional[ModerationConfig] = None
    ):
        self.config = config or ModerationConfig()
        self.redis = redis_client

        # Initialize classifiers
        self.heuristic = HeuristicClassifier()
        self.toxicity = ToxicityClassifier()
        self.spam = SpamClassifier(redis_client)
        self.llm = LLMPolicyAnalyzer()

    def moderate(self, content: ContentItem) -> ModerationDecision:
        """
        Run full moderation pipeline on content.
        """
        start_time = time.time()
        classifications: list[ClassificationResult] = []

        # Tier 1: Heuristic check
        heuristic_result = self.heuristic.classify(content)
        if heuristic_result:
            classifications.append(heuristic_result)

            # Immediate block for high-confidence heuristic match
            if heuristic_result.confidence >= self.config.auto_block_threshold:
                return self._create_decision(
                    content=content,
                    action=ModerationAction.BLOCK,
                    classifications=classifications,
                    reasoning="Blocked by heuristic filter"
                )

        # Tier 1: Toxicity check
        toxicity_result = self.toxicity.classify(content)
        if toxicity_result:
            classifications.append(toxicity_result)

        # Tier 1: Spam check
        spam_result = self.spam.classify(content)
        if spam_result:
            classifications.append(spam_result)

        # Determine if LLM analysis needed
        needs_llm = self._needs_llm_review(classifications)

        if needs_llm or self.config.always_use_llm:
            # Tier 2: LLM analysis
            llm_result = self.llm.analyze(content, classifications)
            classifications.append(llm_result)

        # Make final decision
        return self._make_final_decision(content, classifications)

    def _needs_llm_review(
        self,
        classifications: list[ClassificationResult]
    ) -> bool:
        """Determine if content needs LLM review."""
        if not self.config.llm_for_borderline:
            return False

        for result in classifications:
            # Borderline confidence - needs LLM
            if (self.config.auto_approve_threshold < result.confidence
                < self.config.auto_block_threshold):
                return True

            # Context-sensitive violations need LLM
            if result.violation_type in [
                ViolationType.HATE_SPEECH,
                ViolationType.HARASSMENT,
                ViolationType.MISINFORMATION,
            ] and result.confidence > 0.5:
                return True

        return False

    def _make_final_decision(
        self,
        content: ContentItem,
        classifications: list[ClassificationResult]
    ) -> ModerationDecision:
        """Make final moderation decision based on all classifications."""

        # Collect all violations
        violations = []
        max_confidence = 0.0
        primary_reasoning = ""

        for result in classifications:
            if result.violation_type != ViolationType.NONE:
                violations.append(result.violation_type)
                if result.confidence > max_confidence:
                    max_confidence = result.confidence
                    primary_reasoning = result.details.get(
                        "reasoning",
                        f"Detected by {result.classifier}"
                    )

        # No violations
        if not violations:
            return self._create_decision(
                content=content,
                action=ModerationAction.APPROVE,
                classifications=classifications,
                reasoning="No policy violations detected"
            )

        # Determine action based on confidence
        if max_confidence >= self.config.auto_block_threshold:
            action = ModerationAction.BLOCK
        elif max_confidence >= self.config.llm_review_threshold:
            action = ModerationAction.HUMAN_REVIEW
        else:
            action = ModerationAction.WARNING

        return self._create_decision(
            content=content,
            action=action,
            classifications=classifications,
            reasoning=primary_reasoning,
            violations=violations
        )

    def _create_decision(
        self,
        content: ContentItem,
        action: ModerationAction,
        classifications: list[ClassificationResult],
        reasoning: str,
        violations: Optional[list[ViolationType]] = None
    ) -> ModerationDecision:
        """Create a moderation decision."""

        # Calculate overall confidence
        if classifications:
            confidence = max(c.confidence for c in classifications)
        else:
            confidence = 1.0

        return ModerationDecision(
            content_id=content.id,
            action=action,
            violation_types=violations or [ViolationType.NONE],
            confidence=confidence,
            reasoning=reasoning,
            classifications=classifications,
            requires_appeal=action == ModerationAction.BLOCK,
            reviewed_by="auto"
        )

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ MODERATION PIPELINE FLOW                                    │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                             │
│  Content arrives                                            │
│       │                                                     │
│       ▼                                                     │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐    │
│  │ TIER 1: HEURISTIC                                   │    │
│  │ confidence ≥ 0.95? ──► AUTO-BLOCK (immediate)       │    │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘    │
│       │ continue                                             │
│       ▼                                                      │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐    │
│  │ TIER 1: TOXICITY + SPAM (parallel)                  │    │
│  │ Collect all ClassificationResults                   │    │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘    │
│       │                                                      │
│       ▼                                                      │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐    │
│  │ NEEDS LLM REVIEW?                                   │    │
│  │ • 0.2 < confidence < 0.95 (borderline)             │    │
│  │ • hate_speech, harassment, misinfo + conf > 0.5     │    │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘    │
│       │ yes                                                  │
│       ▼                                                      │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐    │
│  │ TIER 2: LLM ANALYSIS                                │    │
│  │ Add LLM result to classifications                   │    │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘    │
│       │                                                     │
│       ▼                                                     │
│  FINAL DECISION based on max_confidence:                    │
│  • ≥ 0.95 → BLOCK                                          │
│  • ≥ 0.60 → HUMAN_REVIEW                                   │
│  • < 0.60 → WARNING or APPROVE                            │
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

# app/services/queue.py
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
from typing import Optional
from dataclasses import dataclass
import json
import redis

from ..models.content import (
    ContentItem,
    ModerationDecision,
    ModerationAction,
    ViolationType,
)


@dataclass
class ReviewItem:
    """Item in the human review queue."""

    content: ContentItem
    decision: ModerationDecision
    priority: int  # 1 = highest
    assigned_to: Optional[str] = None
    assigned_at: Optional[datetime] = None
    sla_deadline: Optional[datetime] = None


class HumanReviewQueue:
    """
    Manages the human review queue for borderline cases.
    """

    PRIORITY_MAP = {
        ViolationType.SELF_HARM: 1,
        ViolationType.VIOLENCE: 1,
        ViolationType.ILLEGAL: 1,
        ViolationType.HATE_SPEECH: 2,
        ViolationType.HARASSMENT: 2,
        ViolationType.SEXUAL: 3,
        ViolationType.MISINFORMATION: 3,
        ViolationType.SPAM: 4,
        ViolationType.PII: 3,
        ViolationType.NONE: 5,
    }

    SLA_HOURS = {
        1: 1,   # Priority 1: 1 hour
        2: 4,   # Priority 2: 4 hours
        3: 8,   # Priority 3: 8 hours
        4: 24,  # Priority 4: 24 hours
        5: 48,  # Priority 5: 48 hours
    }

    def __init__(self, redis_client: redis.Redis):
        self.redis = redis_client

    def enqueue(
        self,
        content: ContentItem,
        decision: ModerationDecision
    ) -> ReviewItem:
        """Add item to review queue."""

        # Determine priority
        priority = min(
            self.PRIORITY_MAP.get(vt, 5)
            for vt in decision.violation_types
        )

        # Calculate SLA deadline
        sla_hours = self.SLA_HOURS.get(priority, 24)
        sla_deadline = datetime.utcnow() + timedelta(hours=sla_hours)

        item = ReviewItem(
            content=content,
            decision=decision,
            priority=priority,
            sla_deadline=sla_deadline
        )

        # Add to sorted set (priority + timestamp for ordering)
        score = priority * 1e12 + datetime.utcnow().timestamp()

        self.redis.zadd(
            "review_queue",
            {content.id: score}
        )

        # Store full item data
        self.redis.hset(
            "review_items",
            content.id,
            json.dumps({
                "content": content.model_dump(),
                "decision": decision.model_dump(),
                "priority": priority,
                "sla_deadline": sla_deadline.isoformat(),
            }, default=str)
        )

        return item

    def dequeue(self, moderator_id: str) -> Optional[ReviewItem]:
        """Get next item for moderator to review."""

        # Get highest priority unassigned item
        items = self.redis.zrange("review_queue", 0, 0)

        if not items:
            return None

        content_id = items[0].decode() if isinstance(items[0], bytes) else items[0]

        # Remove from queue
        self.redis.zrem("review_queue", content_id)

        # Get item data
        data = self.redis.hget("review_items", content_id)
        if not data:
            return None

        item_data = json.loads(data)

        # Update assignment
        item_data["assigned_to"] = moderator_id
        item_data["assigned_at"] = datetime.utcnow().isoformat()

        self.redis.hset(
            "review_items",
            content_id,
            json.dumps(item_data, default=str)
        )

        return ReviewItem(
            content=ContentItem(**item_data["content"]),
            decision=ModerationDecision(**item_data["decision"]),
            priority=item_data["priority"],
            assigned_to=moderator_id,
            assigned_at=datetime.utcnow(),
            sla_deadline=datetime.fromisoformat(item_data["sla_deadline"])
        )

    def submit_review(
        self,
        content_id: str,
        moderator_id: str,
        final_action: ModerationAction,
        notes: str
    ) -> ModerationDecision:
        """Submit moderator's final decision."""

        # Get item data
        data = self.redis.hget("review_items", content_id)
        if not data:
            raise ValueError(f"Item {content_id} not found")

        item_data = json.loads(data)
        original_decision = ModerationDecision(**item_data["decision"])

        # Create final decision
        final_decision = ModerationDecision(
            content_id=content_id,
            action=final_action,
            violation_types=original_decision.violation_types,
            confidence=1.0,  # Human review = full confidence
            reasoning=f"{original_decision.reasoning}\n\nModerator notes: {notes}",
            classifications=original_decision.classifications,
            requires_appeal=final_action == ModerationAction.BLOCK,
            reviewed_by=moderator_id
        )

        # Clean up
        self.redis.hdel("review_items", content_id)

        # Store for analytics
        self._log_decision(original_decision, final_decision, moderator_id)

        return final_decision

    def _log_decision(
        self,
        original: ModerationDecision,
        final: ModerationDecision,
        moderator_id: str
    ):
        """Log decision for model improvement."""

        log_entry = {
            "content_id": original.content_id,
            "auto_decision": original.action.value,
            "human_decision": final.action.value,
            "was_overturned": original.action != final.action,
            "moderator_id": moderator_id,
            "timestamp": datetime.utcnow().isoformat(),
        }

        self.redis.lpush("moderation_log", json.dumps(log_entry))
        self.redis.ltrim("moderation_log", 0, 99999)  # Keep last 100k

    def get_queue_stats(self) -> dict:
        """Get queue statistics."""

        queue_length = self.redis.zcard("review_queue")

        # Count by priority
        by_priority = {}
        for p in range(1, 6):
            score_min = p * 1e12
            score_max = (p + 1) * 1e12
            count = self.redis.zcount("review_queue", score_min, score_max)
            by_priority[p] = count

        return {
            "total": queue_length,
            "by_priority": by_priority,
        }

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ HUMAN REVIEW QUEUE                                          │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                             │
│  Redis Sorted Set: score = priority * 1e12 + timestamp      │
│                                                             │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐    │
│  │ Priority 1 (SLA: 1 hour)                            │    │
│  │ • SELF_HARM, VIOLENCE, ILLEGAL                      │    │
│  │ • Immediate danger → fastest review                 │    │
│  ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤    │
│  │ Priority 2 (SLA: 4 hours)                           │    │
│  │ • HATE_SPEECH, HARASSMENT                           │    │
│  │ • Serious harm but not immediate danger             │    │
│  ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤    │
│  │ Priority 3 (SLA: 8 hours)                           │    │
│  │ • SEXUAL, MISINFORMATION, PII                       │    │
│  │ • Important but less urgent                         │    │
│  ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤    │
│  │ Priority 4 (SLA: 24 hours)                          │    │
│  │ • SPAM                                              │    │
│  │ • Nuisance but not harmful                          │    │
│  ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤    │
│  │ Priority 5 (SLA: 48 hours)                          │    │
│  │ • Edge cases, appeals                               │    │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘    │
│                                                             │
│  dequeue(moderator_id):                                     │
│  • ZRANGE gets lowest score (highest priority + oldest)     │
│  • Assigns to moderator, tracks SLA                         │
│  • Logs decision for model improvement                      │
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

# app/api/routes.py
from fastapi import APIRouter, HTTPException, BackgroundTasks
from typing import Optional
import redis

from ..models.content import (
    ContentItem,
    ModerationDecision,
    ModerationAction,
)
from ..services.moderation import ModerationOrchestrator, ModerationConfig
from ..services.queue import HumanReviewQueue


router = APIRouter(prefix="/api/v1", tags=["moderation"])

# Initialize services
redis_client = redis.Redis(host="localhost", port=6379, db=0)
moderator = ModerationOrchestrator(redis_client)
review_queue = HumanReviewQueue(redis_client)


@router.post("/moderate", response_model=ModerationDecision)
async def moderate_content(
    content: ContentItem,
    background_tasks: BackgroundTasks
):
    """
    Submit content for moderation.
    Returns immediate decision or queues for human review.
    """

    decision = moderator.moderate(content)

    # Queue for human review if needed
    if decision.action == ModerationAction.HUMAN_REVIEW:
        review_queue.enqueue(content, decision)

    return decision


@router.post("/moderate/batch")
async def moderate_batch(contents: list[ContentItem]):
    """Batch moderation for bulk processing."""

    results = []
    for content in contents:
        decision = moderator.moderate(content)
        results.append(decision)

        if decision.action == ModerationAction.HUMAN_REVIEW:
            review_queue.enqueue(content, decision)

    return {"decisions": results}


@router.get("/queue/stats")
async def get_queue_stats():
    """Get human review queue statistics."""
    return review_queue.get_queue_stats()


@router.post("/queue/next")
async def get_next_review(moderator_id: str):
    """Get next item for moderator to review."""

    item = review_queue.dequeue(moderator_id)
    if not item:
        return {"message": "Queue is empty"}

    return {
        "content": item.content,
        "auto_decision": item.decision,
        "priority": item.priority,
        "sla_deadline": item.sla_deadline,
    }


@router.post("/queue/submit")
async def submit_review(
    content_id: str,
    moderator_id: str,
    action: ModerationAction,
    notes: str = ""
):
    """Submit moderator's final decision."""

    try:
        decision = review_queue.submit_review(
            content_id=content_id,
            moderator_id=moderator_id,
            final_action=action,
            notes=notes
        )
        return decision
    except ValueError as e:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail=str(e))


@router.post("/appeal")
async def submit_appeal(
    content_id: str,
    user_id: str,
    reason: str
):
    """Submit an appeal for blocked content."""

    # Re-queue with high priority
    # In production, implement full appeal workflow

    return {
        "appeal_id": f"appeal_{content_id}",
        "status": "pending",
        "message": "Your appeal has been submitted for review"
    }

# app/main.py
from fastapi import FastAPI
from fastapi.middleware.cors import CORSMiddleware
from prometheus_client import make_asgi_app

from .api.routes import router


app = FastAPI(
    title="Content Moderation API",
    description="AI-powered content moderation system",
    version="1.0.0"
)

# CORS
app.add_middleware(
    CORSMiddleware,
    allow_origins=["*"],
    allow_credentials=True,
    allow_methods=["*"],
    allow_headers=["*"],
)

# Mount routes
app.include_router(router)

# Prometheus metrics
metrics_app = make_asgi_app()
app.mount("/metrics", metrics_app)


@app.get("/health")
async def health():
    return {"status": "healthy"}


if __name__ == "__main__":
    import uvicorn
    uvicorn.run(app, host="0.0.0.0", port=8000)

# docker-compose.yml
version: '3.8'

services:
  api:
    build: .
    ports:
      - "8000:8000"
    environment:
      - REDIS_HOST=redis
      - OPENAI_API_KEY=${OPENAI_API_KEY}
    depends_on:
      - redis
      - postgres
    deploy:
      replicas: 3
      resources:
        limits:
          memory: 4G
        reservations:
          memory: 2G

  worker:
    build: .
    command: celery -A workers.moderation_worker worker -l info
    environment:
      - REDIS_HOST=redis
      - OPENAI_API_KEY=${OPENAI_API_KEY}
    depends_on:
      - redis
    deploy:
      replicas: 5

  redis:
    image: redis:7-alpine
    ports:
      - "6379:6379"
    volumes:
      - redis_data:/data

  postgres:
    image: postgres:15
    environment:
      - POSTGRES_DB=moderation
      - POSTGRES_USER=moderation
      - POSTGRES_PASSWORD=${DB_PASSWORD}
    volumes:
      - postgres_data:/var/lib/postgresql/data

  prometheus:
    image: prom/prometheus
    ports:
      - "9090:9090"
    volumes:
      - ./prometheus.yml:/etc/prometheus/prometheus.yml

  grafana:
    image: grafana/grafana
    ports:
      - "3000:3000"
    environment:
      - GF_SECURITY_ADMIN_PASSWORD=${GRAFANA_PASSWORD}

volumes:
  redis_data:
  postgres_data:

# tests/test_moderation.py
import pytest
from app.models.content import ContentItem, ContentType
from app.services.moderation import ModerationOrchestrator, ModerationConfig


@pytest.fixture
def moderator(redis_client):
    return ModerationOrchestrator(redis_client)


class TestModeration:

    def test_approve_safe_content(self, moderator):
        content = ContentItem(
            id="test1",
            user_id="user1",
            content_type=ContentType.TEXT,
            text="I love sunny days and walking in the park!"
        )

        decision = moderator.moderate(content)
        assert decision.action.value == "approve"

    def test_block_obvious_violation(self, moderator):
        content = ContentItem(
            id="test2",
            user_id="user1",
            content_type=ContentType.TEXT,
            text="Buy now! 90% off! Click here for free money!"
        )

        decision = moderator.moderate(content)
        assert decision.action.value in ["block", "human_review"]
        assert "spam" in [v.value for v in decision.violation_types]

    def test_context_aware_classification(self, moderator):
        # News article about violence should be allowed
        content = ContentItem(
            id="test3",
            user_id="news_outlet",
            content_type=ContentType.TEXT,
            text="Breaking: Police respond to incident downtown. Officials confirm no injuries.",
            context={"account_type": "verified_news"}
        )

        decision = moderator.moderate(content)
        assert decision.action.value == "approve"